[Previous Article] [Table of Contents]
Because the CCA (Barnston 1994) and OCN (Huang et al. 1995) methods are now being used for the official
operational long-lead seasonal forecasts issued by the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP, they are not presented in
detail in this Experimental Forecast Bulletin. However, a brief summary of these forecasts, as well as that of the NCEP
coupled model (Ji et al. 1994), for Jan-Feb-Mar and Apr-May-Jun 1997 is provided. For further information about the
official NCEP forecasts, the following U.S. Regional Climate Center (RCC) Offices may be contacted:
Northeastern RCC 607-255-5950
Southeastern RCC 803-737-0800
Southern RCC 504-388-5021
Midwest RCC 217-244-8226
High Plains RCC 402-472-8294
Western RCC 702-677-3106
The forecasts themselves are contained in the Climate Outlook, available on Internet with address:
http://nic.fb4.noaa.gov. That same address can also be used to access the web site for this Bulletin, as follows:
http://nic.fb4.noaa.gov/products/predictions; then click on "product A-Z list".
U.S. Surface Climate Forecasts for Jan-Feb-Mar '97Temperature: OCN forecasts warmth along eastern seaboard, Texas and the Southwest. CCA predicts warmth from
Southeast to Texas, northern tier (Minnesota eastward), and Kahului; cold Aleutians and Washington. The coupled
model dynamical forecast calls for warm Pacific Northwest, cold in Florida.
Precipitation: CCA predicts dryness south-central Alaska, wet northern Hawaii. OCN predicts wetness Southwest.
The coupled model predicts dry Florida.
U.S. Surface Climate Forecasts for Apr-May-Jun'97Temperature: CCA predicts warmth Southwest, near-normal most of Hawaii. OCN forecasts warmth Southwest,
Northwest, and northern Appalachians; cold Southeast. The coupled model predicts warmth in Washington, Florida.
Precipitation: CCA and the coupled model have no usable skills for this period. OCN predicts above median
rainfall in Washington and Oregon.
Note: The above forecast descriptions include only regions whose estimated cross-validated correla-tion skill
exceeds 0.3. Highest local skills are usually in the neighborhood of 0.6, but this varies with season, lead time and
forecast tool.
ENSO-Related SST
CCA (Barnston and Ropelewski 1992, Smith et al. 1995) predicts slightly below normal SST conditions in Nino
3.4 (120-170oW, 5 oN-5 oS) for this winter 1996-97, switching to a positive anomaly by spring and strengthening (with
low confidence) by summer. Specifically, CCA forecasts the following standardized anomalies and cross-validated
correlation skills:
forecast skill
Jan-Feb-Mar 1997 -0.28 0.90
Apr-May-Jun 1997 0.67 0.59
Jul-Aug-Sep 1997 1.34 0.25
Oct-Nov-Dec 1997 1.52 0.29
Jan-Feb-Mar 1998 1.09 0.45
The forecast for Jan-Feb-Mar 1997 is a skill-weighted average of CCA and simple persistence of the anomaly
observed in Sep-Oct-Nov, because persistence and CCA skills are similar for that forecast. Longer lead forecasts reflect
only CCA. The global field of SST anomaly for December 8-14, 1996 (Fig. 1) shows the currently somewhat below
normal SST in parts of the eastern equatorial Pacific, especially east of 120oW.
Barnston, A.G., 1994: Linear statistical short-term climate predictive skill in the Northern Hemisphere. J. Climate,
5, 1514-1564.
Barnston, A.G. and C.F. Ropelewski, 1992: Prediction of ENSO episodes using canonical correlation analysis.
J. Climate, 7, 1316-1345.
Huang, J., H.M. van den Dool and A.G. Barnston, 1996: Long-lead seasonal temperature prediction using optimal
climate normals. J. Climate, 9, 809-817.
Ji, M., A. Kumar and A. Leetmaa, 1994b: An experimental coupled forecast system at the National Meteorological
Center: Some early results. Tellus, 46A, 398-418.
Reynolds, R.W. and T.M. Smith, 1994: Improved global sea surface temperature analysis using optimum
interpolation. J. Climate, 7, 929-948.
Smith, T.M., A.G. Barnston, M. Ji and M. Chelliah, 1995: The impact of Pacific Ocean subsurface data on
operational prediction of tropical Pacific SST at the NCEP. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 708-714.
Fig. 1. NCEP optimum interpolation (OI; Reynolds and Smith 1994) global SST anomaly field for the week of
December 8-14, 1996.